David de Groot said: Indeed he is. Showing off a fair bit too.
accesser said:
So is the 5D2 ok for birding so far
David de Groot said: Well apart from the obvious wider crop and thus perceived shorter focal length, yeah ;-) The 400D would give me a field of view equiv. to 448mm with the 1.4x TC on, whereas obviously on a full 135 format sensor, you get 280mm (200+1.4x). Still, it's got resolution to spare, so I just cropped it down to 10Mpx and voila ;-)
accesser said:
Yeah the loss of 1.6 crop is the only down side will be great for wide shots
David de Groot said: True, and it has a much more three-dimensional quality to the images too.
looby88 said:
pretty good sir !!
The Central Scrutiniser said:
aah - yes ^^
David de Groot said: Not bad eh ? :-)
AlexandraPhotos said:
Lovely shot. They are so hard to shoot with the speed they move at.
--
Seen in my contacts' photos. (?)
Jack High said:
Indeed a superb looking bird. I love their colours. The radiating foliage really draws the eye onto the bird.
Congrats on the new camera.
David de Groot said: Aye, they're tricky little fellows. I find the Red-backed Fairy-wrens worse though, they're just that little bit smaller and faster. Thanks Jack :) I could have cropped tighter, but like you said the foliage works well.
Pretty,
So is the 5D2 ok for birding so far
Yeah the loss of 1.6 crop is the only down side will be great for wide shots
pretty good sir !!
aah - yes ^^
Lovely shot. They are so hard to shoot with the speed they move at.
--
Seen in my contacts' photos. (?)
Indeed a superb looking bird. I love their colours. The radiating foliage really draws the eye onto the bird.
Congrats on the new camera.